I am interested in possibly reviving the integrated Python
scripting in Mahogany.  I'm a complete newcomer to this project and
before diving in, wish to ask what issues I might face.

Could someone tell me what are the problems associated
with such an effort.  I would be interested in using Python 2.2.1 (the
latest).  I have embedded the Python interpreter before, but have no
knowledge of Mahogany source code (yet).  As I understand the Python
scripting capability, there was/is Python code interfacing to the
internal C++ object model of Mahogany.

While I'm on the subject, I'll just toss in a possibly helpful link to
my favorite C++/Python interfacing tool, the Boost Python Library.
http://www.boost.org/libs/python/doc/index.html
(It is changing because of the type/class unifications in Python 2.2.)

Another semi-related question -- What about a wxPython port of Mahogany?
Does anyone think that would be worthwhile?  I'm interested in all
opinions here.  The question is related because a wxPython
port would yield, as a side effect, an integrated Python
interpreter.  In the end it might be less work to actually do a
wxPython port than a combination wxWindows/embedded Python package.
(Because wxPython mirrors almost 1-to-1 the classes in wxWindows.)
 
Looking forward to your answers and opinions,
 
Kind regards,

Mark Evans



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Mahogany-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers

Reply via email to