On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:27:10 -0500 Mark Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ME> So perhaps it is wise to ask whether M should offer basic GPG support ME> in the near term, with a more full-bodied design in the long term. I surely don't have anything against such basic GPG support but I don't have time to work on it. I can (well, I hope I will) help it by implementing the wxExecute wrapper as I promised but that's about all. OTOH, I am prepared to sacrifice more time for a more long-term encryption framework. The main problem with the The Bat's approach is that it uses the old PGP email standard (the "BEGIN PGP ..." markers in the text) and not the new MIME-based one and I believe that only the latter is important for the future. For example, I see no need to produce the messages in old format even if it might be nice to be able to read them. Regards, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Two, two, TWO treats in one. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
