On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 11:40:31 +0100 Xavier Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
XN> The first point is that the MIME structure does not seem correct. Here XN> is what I get. ... Yes, this definitely doesn't seem right. Do you have mtest (the tool from cclient distribution) on your machine? If so, could you please put this message in an MBOX file (don't forget to prepend a "From " line to it!), open it from mtest and do 'B' command in it -- what does it show? XN> What puzzles me is that there are multiple parts that are numbered 2.1 XN> or 2.2, and that a part numbered 2.2 has sub-parts numbered 2.1 and 2.2. Numbering of the MIME parts [in IMAP] is still not entirely clear to me (see comment in MimePart.h) but this is obviously wrong nevertheless -- different parts can't have the same part number. OTOH, part numbers aren't really used for much currently in the code, so it should still display correctly, i.e. TEXT/PLAIN at the root level first followed by the 2 other TEXT/PLAIN parts under the first RELATED branch of the ALTERNATIVE. What does M show instead? Thanks, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
