On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:18:59 +1000 (E. Australia Standard Time) Mark Livingstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have any of you come across a Mail equivalent for GNKSA? I do not know any. > It's great to work towards staying RFC compliant etc but there is a > lot of them and no real minimun line to aim for. The minimum is RFC2822 (Internet Message Format). We have full support for RFC2045-2049 (MIME series). We have some support (on receiving part) for RFC3156 (MIME Security with OpenPGP). M uses mailing-list headers as per RFC2369 (or is it RFC2929 (List-Id) that we use? I did not check). I did not check the transport part (POP, IMAP, SMTP)... A list of RFCs relevant to mail is here: <http://www.imc.org/rfcs.html> Some features could be thought as 'nice to have' (message/partial, format=flowed), but there does not seem to be a high demand for them. Better have drag-and-drop for moving folder, and all the other bells and whitles that actually simplify user's life... -- Xavier Nodet "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
