On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 19:46:28 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Xavier Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
XN> The change I wanted to propose is that 'From' should not be used if XN> 'Reply-To' is present. It should always be disabled when entering the XN> composer (but not removed). AFAIK the only case when it is _not_ like this now is when you use "reply to sender" command, right? All the others should already prefer reply-to to from. XN> 1. The 'Reply-To' may have been set by the originator of the mail, in XN> which case it is obvious that he does not want a reply to go to the XN> 'From' address (or he would not have created this header in the first XN> place). XN> XN> 2. If the 'Reply-To' has been (wrongly) set by a mailing-list, and one XN> wants to reply to both the sender *and* the list (because the sender XN> is not subscribed), one can reset the 'None' to 'To' or 'Cc' for the XN> address of the sender. XN> XN> Case 2. may be more common than case 1., but is not compliant with XN> section 3.6.3 of RFC2822, and is itself only necessary because of XN> reply-to-munging lists. Right... But still, if we do this, there would be no command to reply only to the sender of a mailing list message sent to such group. Maybe we could be even smarter and only use "From" instead of "Reply-To" if the latter is the same as "To"? This would work correctly in both cases. What do you think? VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers