On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:19:07 +0200 (CEST) Robert Vazan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

RV> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:53:56 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> wrote:
RV> 
RV> >  It's not a solution because we're back at case #1: what happens now
RV> > when a
RV> > folder is renamed? The tree needs to be notified and rebuild all its
RV> > internal data structures... Well, ok, it's doable, but not ideal.
RV> 
RV> This isn't the same case as renaming references.

 No, it isn't, this is why I said it was doable. ut it's rather
complicated...

RV> This looks like my MovedTo/MovedFrom pairing. I dropped this idea,
RV> because it introduces redundancy into configuration. Redundancy is easy
RV> to get wrong and it makes it hard to edit by hand.

 Yes, I can't disagree with this neither. But the sad truth is that doing
the above needs too much time relatively to its importance to be done any
time soon.

 Regards,
VZ



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0
_______________________________________________
Mahogany-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers

Reply via email to