On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:19:07 +0200 (CEST) Robert Vazan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RV> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:53:56 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RV> RV> > It's not a solution because we're back at case #1: what happens now RV> > when a RV> > folder is renamed? The tree needs to be notified and rebuild all its RV> > internal data structures... Well, ok, it's doable, but not ideal. RV> RV> This isn't the same case as renaming references. No, it isn't, this is why I said it was doable. ut it's rather complicated... RV> This looks like my MovedTo/MovedFrom pairing. I dropped this idea, RV> because it introduces redundancy into configuration. Redundancy is easy RV> to get wrong and it makes it hard to edit by hand. Yes, I can't disagree with this neither. But the sad truth is that doing the above needs too much time relatively to its importance to be done any time soon. Regards, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0 _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers