On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 00:49:37 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
VZ> On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 00:34:41 +0200 (CEST) Michele Ravani VZ> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: VZ> VZ> MR> Hmm, why would I want to expand an address below the entry field? VZ> VZ> Because you might decide to change it later. I agree that this VZ> shouldn't VZ> happen often but why not have the expand button there as well? It VZ> doesn't VZ> hurt, does it? I was thinking that in such a case you would delete (it is so easy now) and enter a new address. In any case it is just a minor thing. VZ> MR> The empty field may look better at the bottom. VZ> VZ> Hmm, you're probably right, but then it could be scrolled away. Like VZ> it is VZ> now, it's never scrolled at all which is a bit weird but at least it's VZ> always visible. It is true that you'd have to know that it is there somewhere. What if the 'New Address' button would be in the toolbar, instead on the far right of the first address field, and clicking it would bring you to the new address entry field (or pop up the address book for selection)?` VZ> MR> It is somewhat more natural and particularly when replying VZ> MR> you'd rather see more addresses. VZ> VZ> But I think that if you don't see the address entry zone at all it's VZ> not VZ> that good neither... Unfortunately it is. It would be good to have more input of newcomers as they aren't spoiled by history in their perceptions of the interface. But then again, we are talking minor points here. Ciao -- Michele Ravani [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Those who live hoping, die singing" My Gran _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
