> On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 10:49:51 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AGI> I think the keyboard behavior is much superior and that > AGI> clicking the trash can icon should yield the same result > AGI> (i.e., should move to the next msg).
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 20:29:32 +0200 (EET) Nerijus Baliunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe, but sometimes I use it (trash icon in toolbar), when I > don't want next message to be selected and loose its unread status. Do you know about this: ctrl-space d On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 21:55:35 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm unsure about how does it imply the latter assertion though. Although, > as I said, it wasn't intentional, I don't know if it's really wrong. Since I rely on keyboard shortcuts as I learn them, this is not at all crucial to me personally. But yes I think it is quite wrong. i. it is not consistent with the result when msgs are moved to trash when marked for deletion ii. it is not convenient for someone who is a mouse user (try reading your msgs this way: click to open, click trash to delete, click a new msg to open, etc.) iii. it does not match behavior I can recall from other email clients iv. users that really want to just mark a msg for deletion and nothing else can use the context menu, so there is no real loss in providing the more desirable (so I claim) behavior. Cheers, Alan _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
