VZ> 1. you have exactly one selected message in which case it is previewed VZ> and the selection is preserved, i.e. if you delete it the next VZ> message VZ> is selected &c VZ> VZ> 2. you have 0 or more than 2 selected messages -- in this case there is VZ> no current preview and the selection is no preserved.
...which is inconsistent in my sense q.e.d. :-) That you have to say this, shows that it adds one more rule to the description of M's behaviour making it more complex. Simplifying this would make it easier. I always want to see the last touched message (after some delay). Would you dislike this behaviour or is it a matter of not having time for such things? In the latter case I would try to implement this myself. But I don't want to manage a parallel mahogany revision, that's why I discuss it here. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
