On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 01:30:11 +0100 (CET) Michele Ravani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MR> On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 00:04:46 +0100 (Romance Standard Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: MR> MR> VZ> On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 02:54:39 +0100 (CET) Slegge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MR> VZ> wrote: MR> MR> VZ> again and so now it should compile ok. If it doesn't (at this place), MR> VZ> you MR> VZ> just have to change Remove(0) into Remove(0u) or vice versa depending MR> VZ> on MR> VZ> who has got the upper hand in the discussions on wx-dev the last time MR> VZ> ;-) MR> MR> Oops, I forgot this message and put the change in the CVS. MR> Wasn't I supposed to? To be honest, I don't think you were because I did restore the old Remove() signature in wxWin cvs (i.e. it now takes int again) and so the code should compile now without problems -- except that with your change it doesn't work again. I think you should update your wxWin sources from the cvs and revert this change in our cvs... Thanks, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
