Does Mahogany fully implement RFC-1341? Specifically, is my correspondent correct that I should not see the resource fork "portion" of a file listed separately?
Thank you, Alan ------ Forwarded message ------ Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 13:12:10 -0500 Subject: Re: notes from last meeting To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 25. Jan 2004, at 10:43 am, Alan G Isaac wrote: > Your email came with two attachments: > [Attachment: info_svc_9_12_2003.doc : APPLICATION/APPLEFILE, 524 bytes] > [Attachment: info_svc_9_12_2003.doc : APPLICATION/MSWORD, 44844 bytes] Actually, the first is the resource fork portion of the file -- it's a Macintosh thing. The fact that your e-mail client showed the two attachments separately means that it doesn't implement RFC-1341 properly -------- End of message ------- ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
