On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Vadim Zeitlin apparently wrote: > we use MBX because its performance is better than MBOX and > there is, of course, no limitation for using MBX on > server-side only. Of course we also give the choice of > using MBOX
I guess the core question is: what should the default mailbox format be? I do not pretend to know, but I have had two experiences that make me suspect MBOX is the right answer: - I have had two time a problem with header corruption, and there is no clear path to repair. This is a bad experience. - "User friendly" tools for MBOX access appear to be widespread, but not so for MBX. Perhaps, at a minimum, such guidance could appear in the documents. Cheers, Alan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
