That's OK. It was a diaresis anyway, not an umlaut.
On 2/6/08 10:33 AM, "Jeff Eastman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, it was the spelling corrector, no umlaut intended. > Jeff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Dunning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:13 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Package Structure > > > This is Microsoft's spelling corrector in action. Presumably his > programming editor won't do this. > > > On 2/6/08 12:44 AM, "Thilo Goetz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Jeff Eastman wrote: >>> naïve_bayes. >> >> You probably didn't mean this literally, but just in case: >> I'd vote for ascii-only characters in all things Java (and >> source code in general); anything other than ascii is just >> asking for trouble. I write the language of umlauts, so I >> know what I'm talking about ;-) >> >> --Thilo >> >
