Jeff Eastman skrev:
1. While I find the notation awkward and tedious, I think making the
Matrix interfaces use generics is the best solution for supporting a
family of efficient implementations: from Boolean through Integer to
Double. I note that boxed types would need to replace the primitives but
also that the sparse implementations already use them so the main impact
would be on the dense implementations. I'm an old Smalltalk guy, and the
idea of everything being an object just does not bother me.
Good. I want all values to be Objects and have the data definition model
tell me how to treat them. It makes very little sense to me to use hard
typed stuff at this level. But that is just me.
karl
