Hmmm...

Is there a more elegant way to go here?  Is there a way for the
CanopyClusteringJob to infer which jar by looking at the class?  I think
that Hadoop does something like this via the class loader.

This current method looks ripe for very obscure bugs.


On 3/5/08 4:49 PM, "Grant Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I changed the main's to pass in the location of the jar, since the ANT
> task puts the jar in basedir/dist.  I made a comment about it on
> Mahout-3.  The Canopy driver should do the right thing?????  I also
> did the same thing w/ the k-means.
> 
> 
> On Mar 5, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
> 
>> Here's my job driver, it works fine with ManhattanDistanceMeasure but
>> not SystemLoadDistanceMeasure.
>> 
>> Jeff
>> 
>> public static void main(String[] args) {
>>    String input = args[0];
>>    String output = args[1];
>>    int t1 = new Integer(args[2]);
>>    int t2 = new Integer(args[3]);
>>    JobConf conf = new JobConf(
>>        com.collabnet.hadoop.systemload.access.DriverA.class);
>>    Path outPath = new Path(output);
>>    try {
>>      FileSystem dfs = FileSystem.get(conf);
>>      if (dfs.exists(outPath))
>>        dfs.delete(outPath);
>>      DriverA.runJob(input, output);
>>      DriverP.runJob(input, output);
>>      DriverC.runJob(output, output);
>>      CanopyClusteringJob.runJob(output + "/combined", output,
>>          SystemLoadDistanceMeasure.class.getName(), t1, t2,
>>          "apache-mahout-0.1-dev.jar");
>>      DriverS.runJob(output + "/clusters", output);
>>    } catch (IOException e) {
>>      e.printStackTrace();
>>    }
>>  }
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 11:44 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Class Loader Problem
>> 
>> 
>> Where is your code?
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/5/08 11:28 AM, "Jeff Eastman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm wondering if you can see anything
>>> wrong with my packaging or, perhaps, how the Canopy class is going
>> about
>>> instantiating it.
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to