Is this also overlapping w/ what Karl suggested earlier using the Data
Mining JSR?
On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
I think the whole area of intra-Mahout and extra-Mahout
representations is
one that needs further study. I glanced over the URL you provided
and this
certainly looks like something to consider. It is a bit premature to
pick
one at this point, but please feel free to investigate how it might be
applied to Mahout. In terms of practical next steps you could:
1. Open a Jira to investigate external representation formats for
Mahout
2. Propose a set of criteria that you think ought to apply to such
representations
3. Contribute a business case for why this particular representation
would
satisfy those criteria
4. Investigate alternative representations and evaluate them so we
can be
sure we have done a reasonable due diligence
These steps would put us all in a much better position to answer your
original question.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: shunkai.fu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 6:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: input and output format following PMML specification
Hi,
Do you guys think we need support PMML format, in term of input and
output?
It is proposed by several key companies focusing on DM, and you can
find
more information on http://www.dmg.org/ .
Best,
Shunkai
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucenebootcamp.com
Next Training: April 7, 2008 at ApacheCon Europe in Amsterdam
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
