I think it would be much better for Jira to publish it. The "how to submit" page says that it should come in on the patch, but that means the comments are quadrupplicated (once in Changes.txt in the patch, once on the patch, once on Jira with the patch and once on the SVN check-in). Surely duplicated is enough (on Jira when uploading the patch and once on SVN when the patch is committed).
On 4/1/08 3:37 PM, "Karl Wettin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Grant Ingersoll skrev: >> I noticed the other day that Hadoop just uses JIRA to publish the >> CHANGES.txt. Seems a lot easier to me, but wanted to see if anyone >> prefers having a local version that they can edit. >> >> See >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin. >> system.project:changelog-panel >> >> >> Versus Lucene Java's form: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_2_3_0/CHANGES.txt > > Did we de facto choose not choose to use CHANGES.txt? I sort of like > taking a look in there every time I update my Lucene trunk. > > > karl
