Grant Ingersoll skrev:
One of the main discussions was on obtaining data to be used by anyone
coming in to the project who may not have data.
Rulebased instance generation and the possibillity to grow an existing
data set with morphed instances would be very nice contributions.
> There were a couple of good suggestions: Apache mail archives, Apache
> web logs (possibly, after being dedacted), as well as the usual
> suspects like Wikipedia, Reuters collection (David Lewis), etc.
I have been thinking about analyzing emails. We could try tagging
everything we send to the list:
"This is a problem"
"The problem is identical to problem #"
"This is a solution to a problem"
"This is confirmation that the solution works or does not work"
"This is an alternative solution to solution #"
"About classification"
"About clustering"
et c.
Perhaps treat tag names as unique per email address and map them to some
top level of tags. [sug]
> If someone wants to take up creating a simple util for cleaning up
> mail archives for use, that would be a great contribution.
Apache James does mbox archives and grammar to parse anything but
replies from Hossman is simple stuff. [sug] [prob]
It would be great if someone somehow could use that information to
implement an email thread de-jeopardy quotation formatter so I always
got to read emails the way I like it. [wish]
karl
