On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jul 31, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Robin Anil wrote: > >> Right now I have made sure that the output of the Trainer creates some >>>> values. Which are then used in the final CBayes equation calculated in >>>> the >>>> getWeight(feature, label) function. The only thing i need to modify it >>>> to >>>> be >>>> a Bayes classifier with all the >>>> weight and length normalization except Cbayes complexity is just a few >>>> code >>>> change in the Model. >>>> >>>> Should i go ahead and change the Bayes classifier in the Next Patch >>>> >>>> >>> +1 Do what you need to do. What do you think about moving towards a >>> matrix model, though, and using the proposed Matrix labels? >>> >> >> >> I did not get this part. How are we going to make it as a Matrix Model? Is >> it explained in the other threads? >> > > > Well, we do all this string concatenation to build up the model, just seems > like we could work off of a matrix, but no worries, let's get in what we > have and then we can work on optimizing, etc. > Yes That makes a lot of sense. But for that a common set of readers for Text, Real Numbers and Image have to be written. > > I think once we get this in and maybe the ARFF reader, then we can put out > a 0.1 release, which should get us some users and a bit more feedback, etc. > In these early stages, I think it is important to not be too tied to any > particular way of doing it, as most of us are learning a lot as we go > (except maybe Ted, who is an ML guru...) +1 Expect my patch in the next one hour. (including just the changed Bayes Fileformatter) > > > -Grant >
