+1 to 1 tarball, containing source but not build products except for the main .jar file.
On 9/18/08, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, I misread. Just the source itself is good enough, IMO. We can > change if there is a huge clamoring for it, or if someone posts a patch. > > On Sep 18, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Karl Wettin wrote: > >> >> 18 sep 2008 kl. 21.15 skrev Grant Ingersoll: >> >>>> >>>> I suggest we simply distribute a tar/zip-ball that contains the >>>> complete trunk, the core javadocs and core jar-file. And that's >>>> it. I.e. no examples jar nor examples javadocs. >>> >>> I think we'll want the examples and javadocs. That's about the >>> only way people are going to be able to get started. I think 1 >>> tar/zip ball is good, though, that has the source, the libs and the >>> examples and docs. >> >> But do we really need to supply an example jar and javadocs of the >> example source code? Isn't the source code enough by it self? >> >> >> karl > > >
