I had already planned on going to the conference for other reasons, so I can
be kind of a "messenger" if none of you can make it.

Of course, ideally one of you can go and actually participate in the
discussion.



On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Yeah, we need to hurry up, if we're going to do it.
>
>
> On Sep 29, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
>  Grant,
>>
>> I could "force" myself to go if necessary as long as it doesn't conflict
>> with December 2-3.
>>
>> Note the October 1 deadline.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >wrote:
>>
>>  I'm interested, but don't know if I can attend, as much as I would love
>>> to
>>> go to Whistler in December.  Let's talk off list, and we can add others
>>> if
>>> they are interested.  We should have a release out w/in the week, so I
>>> would
>>> think that would be acceptable.
>>>
>>> -Grant
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 28, 2008, at 9:47 PM, Chuck Lam wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've been a lurker on the dev mailing list, hoping to make some code
>>>> contribution at some point but haven't gotten around to it yet :P
>>>>
>>>> In any case, my background is a machine learning researcher, and I want
>>>> the
>>>> Mahout developers to be aware of this NIPS Workshop on Machine Learning
>>>> Open
>>>> Source Software in December of this year.
>>>>
>>>> http://mloss.org/workshop/nips08/
>>>>
>>>> NIPS is one of the top 3-4 conferences for machine learning researchers.
>>>> It
>>>> was in fact at this conference in 2006 where the Stanford MapReduce
>>>> machine
>>>> learning paper was presented. (And obviously that paper is an important
>>>> reference point for Mahout.) I think it's extremely important for Mahout
>>>> to
>>>> have a presence at the workshop, both to recruit contributors and to
>>>> understand the open source direction of the general machine learning
>>>> community.
>>>>
>>>> The submission deadline is Oct. 1, which obviously is extremely tight.
>>>> However, they're only looking for a 500-word abstract right now, and
>>>> deadline for this type of workshop is usually flexible if we can
>>>> convince
>>>> the workshop organizers the importance of our work. Another requirement
>>>> is
>>>> that the software must be officially released at the time of submission.
>>>> I
>>>> don't know the legal definition of that, but I would think that release
>>>> candidate 3 is probably good enough.
>>>>
>>>> I had already planned on attending NIPS, so I'm more than happy to help
>>>> one
>>>> of the main Mahout contributors on positioning and presenting Mahout to
>>>> the
>>>> NIPS researchers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>

Reply via email to