I committed this change as part of a somewhat larger overhaul of this part of the code. Good suggestion.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Sean Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm good point. At the end I'd have to copy and sort the items but > that is no big deal. I like it, I'll change it. > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Generally in this sort of structure, you are keeping the top N items. >> Consider top == biggest. >> >> The required operations are >
