On Saturday, June 20, 2009, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds pretty good to me.
+1 > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]>wrote: > >> So, should we just go to having everything be binary and then have >> Input/Output utilities that can take the binary format and output GSON? >> Seems like w/ Canopy, since it's used for feeding into other algorithms >> that it should output Writable as well, otherwise we're still going to be >> round tripping through Text. +1 Perhaps it would be better to move the conversion code (eg tabular -> Vectors) from examples into either core or a new module so it can be more easily be maintained and reused - Robert >> >> Then, it would be pretty easy to write a M/R job that takes Vectors and >> outputs asFormatString(), right? >> >
