Yes I think that is the meaning, and I don't intend to 'expand' along these lines (by myself -- sounds like a nice sibling project). I see it as fairly separate question, what the inputs means and how they are constructed. It's not like supplying a fork but no spoon. So that's why I didn't quite get why that's somehow a disadvantage. Kind of like criticizing Tomcat for not including Wordpress or something.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Otis Gospodnetic<[email protected]> wrote: > Regarding "only doing CF" - maybe they mean to imply there are no other > inputs other than co-visitation data. For example, no watching of user > behaviour on the page (how long did they stay? did they scroll? did they > page? did they highlight a piece of text while reading?) or consideration of > document similarity. > > Of course, Taste is not at all web-specific, so that user behaviour is > something one would/could build on top of Taste. But of course they didn't > email mahout-user to discuss this first -- it's not in their interest. :) >
