Sure. We've gone a while without a release though. I only suggest that, at this point, anything that's not done is something that should be finished in 0.3, including said speedups. How about that? recall the downside to *not* releasing all these improvements we've been sitting on for even another 2 weeks.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > Well, we should go through and evaluate what is open and whether it really > should be in 0.2, instead of just fixing a date and cutting things off. > There are a few open items that I think need to be in 0.2, most importantly > the SparseVector speedups.
