On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Jake Mannix <[email protected]> wrote:
> What's more problematic is that Vector doesn't have any iterator methods, > either dense or nonZero. This means we have to subclass as well as > wrap, which is a total pain. > I am sure that they would be open for patches on this. > They also don't have the equivalent of the OrderedIntDoubleVector that > Ted has in his patch ( MAHOUT-165 ), > I just changed the name. Didn't write the code. (credit where due and all that) Immutable OrderedIntDoubleVectors also have the potential to be the lowest memory overhead around. > Our apis currently may be "ad-hoc", but as someone who's had to write > a vector api quite a few times in my life now, I like the one you guys > came up with here a lot better than the one in cmath (not quite > as nice as Colt's, but with better names). > Aw shucks. But again, I bet that the math guys would love the feedback and patches to make it all better. -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve
