[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779033#action_12779033
]
Jake Mannix commented on MAHOUT-165:
------------------------------------
So I found Wolfgang Hoschek, the author of Colt, and he confirms that it is no
longer maintained, and wishes us the best of luck in taking it over for
ourselves if we so desired.
If we transplant it (I'd rather call it a transplant than a fork, if the
original trunk of the tree is dead), what's the procedure?
* Build a jar, put it in the apache maven repository?
* Include all allowed source (inside of core/source/main/java?) with original
package names and no changes other than removing the hep.aida.* classes?
* something else?
> Using better primitives hash for sparse vector for performance gains
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAHOUT-165
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-165
> Project: Mahout
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Matrix
> Affects Versions: 0.2
> Reporter: Shashikant Kore
> Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Fix For: 0.3
>
> Attachments: colt.jar, mahout-165-trove.patch,
> MAHOUT-165-updated.patch, mahout-165.patch, MAHOUT-165.patch, mahout-165.patch
>
>
> In SparseVector, we need primitives hash map for index and values. The
> present implementation of this hash map is not as efficient as some of the
> other implementations in non-Apache projects.
> In an experiment, I found that, for get/set operations, the primitive hash of
> Colt performance an order of magnitude better than OrderedIntDoubleMapping.
> For iteration it is 2x slower, though.
> Using Colt in Sparsevector improved performance of canopy generation. For an
> experimental dataset, the current implementation takes 50 minutes. Using
> Colt, reduces this duration to 19-20 minutes. That's 60% reduction in the
> delay.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
