+1

On Nov 19, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Sean Owen wrote:

> I agree that we should have some serious SVM support. I also just
> closed out a very old issue on this topic!
> 
> I am all for it if you can submit some code, that you are basically
> willing to support. A Hadoop-based implementation is ideal, but
> anything consistent is good in my book.
> 
> Post a patch if you'd like to proceed, IMHO.
> 
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Mike,
>> 
>> Good to hear from you.
>> 
>> A solid Java implementation of SVM would be of interest.  A highly scalable
>> implementation would be even more interesting.
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:15 AM, mike bowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>>  I’m a newbie here and am a little timid about raising my hand, but I do
>>> want to be helpful, so here goes.  If I’m making some mistake in etiquette,
>>> please let me know (but be gentle).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The most commonly used algorithm for SVM is based on work done be John
>>> Platt at Microsoft Reasearch (used for example in libsvm).  I’ve attached
>>> Platt’s original paper.  It’s also still available from Microsoft Research.
>>>  The commonly used version of the algorithm is based on improvements
>>> suggested by Keerti et al.  That paper is also attached.  The improved
>>> algorithm boils down to very few steps.  I’ve attached a single page pdf
>>> that succinctly summarizes the improved algorithm.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I’ve coded this algorithm in C++ and Python and will happily supply code or
>>> can easily re-code into Java in a day or so.  I hope this is helpful.  Do I
>>> need to ask that you feel free to comment?
>>> 
>>> mike
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Ted Dunning, CTO
>> DeepDyve
>> 

--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/

Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids) using 
Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search

Reply via email to