The idea here is that the templates are checked in. The build process
goes template-to-java and then compiles the java. In other words, the
java classes are not checked in and editable.
If this is not acceptable, I'll just manually create all the classes.
It's just easier to keep them in sync if there's one source instead of
16 to edit. (The presumption here is that all of 16 classes
{Byte,Char,Int,Long}x{Byte,Int,Char,Long} are really identical except
for the data types).
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:
> not if there is editable and compilable source of some kind.
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Benson Margulies
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> The Trove people use a code generator to get all the variations of
>> IntByte, IntChar, IntInt, IntLong. Does anyone have strenuous
>> objections to this sort of thing?
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ted Dunning, CTO
> DeepDyve
>
