OK, then the class name appeals to me. I'll propose a patch.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have had too many unpleasant experiences using Spring to be enthused about > jumping fully into it for this one use case. > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Benson Margulies > <bimargul...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> One moral equivalent of Spring is a String property with a >> fully-qualified class name which RandomUtils instantiates to get its >> RNG. Another is to actually inject the RNG object. Spring would get >> really tempting here. >> >> I've had an extended immersion in Spring via CXF, so I have a low >> threshold for introducing it. >> >> >