OK, then the class name appeals to me. I'll propose a patch.

On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have had too many unpleasant experiences using Spring to be enthused about
> jumping fully into it for this one use case.
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Benson Margulies 
> <bimargul...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> One moral equivalent of Spring is a String property with a
>> fully-qualified class name which RandomUtils instantiates to get its
>> RNG. Another is to actually inject the RNG object. Spring would get
>> really tempting here.
>>
>> I've had an extended immersion in Spring via CXF, so I have a low
>> threshold for introducing it.
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to