On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think that the real issue for me is that we have two meanings of utils. > One is "generally useful stuff in core" and the other is "things that use > mahout to do cool things". >
This is my problem too: *examples* is "things that use mahout to do useful things". Because utils depends on core and not vice versa, I kinda end up never wanting to put *anything* in there, because then I know I can't use it later in core, arg! -jake
