Actually, this makes the case that we should have something like:
microMapReduce(aggregatorFunction, aggregatorUnit, binaryMapFunction,
vectorA, vectorB)
The name should be changed after its rhetorical effect has worn off. As the
Chukwa guys tend to say, its turtles all the way down. We can have
map-reduce inside map-reduce.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Robin Anil <robin.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> TODO: sum of minus to be optimised without having to hold the intermediate
> vector.
>
--
Ted Dunning, CTO
DeepDyve
