FWIW, I think we're pretty close on MAHOUT-301. I also think there may
be a couple issues with what's in there now for bin/mahout (pre-301).
So I'd say +1 for a freeze >except< for MAHOUT-301 (which I guess
isn't a freeze then :-D)

+1 for switching to the hadoop rc for testing.

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So to be an annoying voice of dissent... I'm going to keep iterating on
> MAHOUT-301,
> targetted for 0.4, and I will keep it in patch form (not checked in) _for
> now_... but
> if it can get its wrinkles ironed out before Hadoop gets its act together, I
> really
> think it should get committed to 0.3.
>
> It's minimally invasive (one java file, and some config files, all additions
> (not
> changes), and then changes to the mahout shell script), and has the
> potential
> to really make repeatedly running our tools far easier than it currently is.
>
>  -jake
>
> ps.  if we are really doing a code freeze, can we make a dev branch (or
> more appropriately, make a 0.3 release branch, and allow continued
> development
> on trunk)?  We don't really want to hold up on producing new stuff, do we?
> More more MORE! ;)
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 to code freeze, waiting for hadoop release and testing the RC
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Isabel Drost <isa...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > On Feb 23, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > It does look imminent. As much as I don't like holding out longer,
>> > > > and indefinitely, for this release, somehow I'd also really like to
>> > > > link to the latest/greatest and official Hadoop release.
>> > > >
>> > > > Let's try to be good about sticking to the code freeze -- good
>> > > > chance to focus on polish -- and if 0.20.2 isn't out by end of
>> > > > week, revisit this.
>> > >
>> > > +1.   We might as well upgrade to the RC, too, by adding it as a
>> > > dependency.
>> >
>> > +1 (to both proposals)
>> >
>> > Isabel
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ted Dunning, CTO
>> DeepDyve
>>
>

Reply via email to