Seems we are most productive when its a code freeze :) +1 from me as well. You have time till Hadoop resolves 6617, assuming nothing gets broken
Robin On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey all, > > Our "flash-freeze" has unthawed considerably, but I've been trying to be > good and not check in stuff with functionality improvements I've been > wanting to check in. > > What do you folks say about me checking in fixes for > > MAHOUT-312 </jira/browse/MAHOUT-312> DistributedRowMatrix iterateAll() and > iterate() don't work on multi-part SequenceFiles </jira/browse/MAHOUT-312> > > MAHOUT-313 </jira/browse/MAHOUT-313> DistributedRowMatrix needs > times(Vector) implementation as M/R job </jira/browse/MAHOUT-313> > > which together basically solve > > MAHOUT-310 </jira/browse/MAHOUT-310> LanczosSolver and > DistributedLanczosSolver always assume rectangular input, but should also > handle symmetric eigensystems. </jira/browse/MAHOUT-310> > > and a nice freebie I've got a patch for is > > MAHOUT-314 </jira/browse/MAHOUT-314>DistributedRowMatrix needs a sparse > DistributedRowMatrix times(DistributedRowMatrix other) > implementation</jira/browse/MAHOUT-314> > > Unit tests are included, and all current tests continue to pass. These > changes make DistributedRowMatrix a much-more fully-featured Matrix > implementation, and will allow for our users to come up with their own > ideas > for uses of a nice big HDFS-backed sparse matrix, instead of simply using > it > for SVD (which is basically all it's useful for without this patch). > > Can I get these in for 0.3? I could commit today if it's ok with the team. > > -jake >
