+1, Count me in.

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote:
> Now that 0.3 is almost out and also given discussions over on 
> gene...@lucene.a.o, I think we can start discussing the details of Mahout as 
> TLP with specifics of what the PMC would look like.
>
> Below is a proposed resolution based on the Hadoop one from a few years back. 
>  I'd like to discuss this first for a few days and then call a subsequent 
> vote.  The vote would be to ask the Lucene PMC to submit the resolution below 
> [3] to the ASF Board.  I would suggest we set the vote to begin this Friday, 
> March 19th.  That gives people 5 days to process/discuss.
>
> There are a few things to consider when forming a new PMC, (feel free to 
> add).  I tried to mark my personal opinion with my initials: GSI.
>
> For more on the PMC, see http://apache.org/dev/#pmc
>
> 1. Who is on the PMC?
>
> Often times, you just make all existing committers PMC members.  There is 
> also something to be said for the PMC only being those people who are active 
> and truly plan on helping out.  Mahout has a few committers who haven't 
> contributed in a long time but haven't elected to become Emeritus either.
>
> Here's the list of current committers:
>
>        • Isabel Drost (isa...@...)
>        • Ted Dunning (tdunn...@...)
>        • Jeff Eastman (jeast...@...)
>        • Drew Farris (d...@...)
>        • Otis Gospodnetic (o...@...)
>        • Grant Ingersoll (gsing...@...)
>        • Sean Owen (sro...@...)
>        • Karl Wettin (ka...@...)
>        • AbdelHakim Deneche (adene...@...)
>        • David Hall (d...@...)
>        • Robin Anil (robina...@...)
>        • Benson Margulies (bimargul...@...)
>        • Jake Mannix
>
> It is generally considered best practice at the ASF to "Go Emeritus" if you 
> haven't contributed in over 1 year.  That is, if you've moved on, let us know 
> so that we can revert your commit bits, etc. for security reasons.  As 
> always, all Emeritus committers are welcome back at any time simply by saying 
> they wish to rejoin.
>
> An alternative would be to have people explicitly opt in over the next few 
> days during the discussion.  That is, if you are interested in being on the 
> PMC and feel like you are willing to help setup and run the PMC, then opt-in. 
>  If your name is on the list and we don't hear from you in the days leading 
> up to the vote, then we will assume you are not interested.
>
> All existing committers would retain their committership if we go for a 
> smaller PMC.
>
> GSI: I personally think the Opt-In model is best as it helps cement that 
> someone is truly interested in helping out.  Consider this my "I'm in" 
> declaration if we go that route.
>
> 2. Who is the Chair of the PMC?
>
> The Chair is a VP of the ASF and is responsible for reporting to the Board 
> amongst other things (commit karma, handling software grants, monitoring 
> incubation, etc.  See http://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair for a full list of 
> duties.)  Our resolution doesn't have to designate a chair, but we can if we 
> want to.  If we don't want to, then we would handle the nominations/election 
> on the private list once it is setup as our first order of business.  I've 
> asked the Board for "Best Practice" recommendation on this and will let you 
> know their guidance.
>
> GSI: Barring the Board suggesting otherwise, I'd suggest we handle the 
> election privately after the TLP is established so just as we do with any 
> personnel matter (i.e. electing committers).
>
> 3. Finally, here's the Board Resolution based on above:
>
> X. Establish the Apache Mahout Project
>
>      WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>      interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>      Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
>      Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
>      open-source software related to a machine learning platform
>      for distribution at no charge to the public.
>
>      NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
>      Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Mahout Project",
>      be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
>      Foundation; and be it further
>
>      RESOLVED, that the Apache Mahout Project be and hereby is
>      responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
>      related to a distributed computing platform; and be it further
>
>      RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Mahout" be
>      and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
>      serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
>      of the Apache Mahout Project, and to have primary responsibility
>      for management of the projects within the scope of
>      responsibility of the Apache Mahout Project; and be it further
>
>      RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>      hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>      Apache Mahout Project:
>
>        • Isabel Drost (isa...@...)
>        • Ted Dunning (tdunn...@...)
>        • Jeff Eastman (jeast...@...)
>        • Drew Farris (d...@...)
>        • Otis Gospodnetic (o...@...)
>        • Grant Ingersoll (gsing...@...)
>        • Sean Owen (sro...@...)
>        • Karl Wettin (ka...@...)
>        • AbdelHakim Deneche (adene...@...)
>        • David Hall (d...@...)
>        • Robin Anil (robina...@...)
>        • Benson Margulies (bimargul...@...)
>        • Jake Mannix
>
>      RESOLVED, that the Apache Mahout Project be and hereby
>      is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
>      Lucene Mahout sub-project; and be it further
>
>      RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
>      Lucene Mahout sub-project encumbered upon the
>      Apache Mahout Project are hereafter discharged.
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to