On Apr 16, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jake Mannix wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I will start playing around with Anthony's github-based stuff, and >>> see where a patch can be made. The question is where it would >>> go? It's a fully functioning project already over on its own. >> >> >> I suppose that's my question too -- what is being fixed by a move? >> > > What is being fixed is that we currently have an open ticket for providing > LSA hooks for Solr, and lsa4solr provides an end-to-end solution for that > particular task, along with a bunch of other nice things (clojure wrapping > and thus the REPL). If we want to say "MAHOUT-343 is a Don't Fix",
Well, M-343 isn't necessarily an LSA spot. It was a placeholder for a GSOC student to come in and do some integration. But, still I see this as a really good start. For the record, I'd love to see a Taste-Lucene/Solr marriage too. :-) Lots of opportunities here! Just need more time. -Grant
