NamedVectorWritable would go with it. ... and if you're going to bring up that that gets a little complicated, I totally agree, and would love to get on a tangent about making this a decorator pattern rather than subclass.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote: > What would be the Writable hierarchy with this NamedVector proposal? > >> > On Apr 18, 2010 11:05 AM, "Sean Owen" <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On > keeping 'name': sure, I ... > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Ok this is a good con... >
