Yup, same scheme at CXF. On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>wrote:
> > On Apr 21, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > Confluence? > > Yeah, that's pretty much it. I'm thinking we have a static front page and > then backed by some pages on Confluence. Check out what > http://ofbiz.apache.org. > > -Grant > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Robin Anil <robin.a...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> I can help out in the redesign. Is there a CMS approved by apache > security, > >> something which will get patched automatically? > >> > >> Robin > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Robin Anil wrote: > >>> > >>>> Today is the day :) > >>> > >>> Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy > lifting > >> to > >>> do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable, > >> just > >>> so people have reasonable expectations. > >>> > >>> Anyone up for a website redesign? I'm kind of thinking we do like > OFBiz > >>> and have a nice landing page, and then everything else is driven off > >>> Confluence. Thoughts? > >>> > >>> -Grant > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Benson Margulies < > >> bimargul...@gmail.com > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Here's a practical matter: > >>>>> > >>>>> svn layout. > >>>>> > >>>>> starting at the root we get, I propose: > >>>>> > >>>>> - sandboxes > >>>>> - mahout(/trunk,tag,branches) > >>>>> - collections(/trunk/tag/branches) > >>>>> > >>>>> sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will > >>>>> contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and > >>>>> collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go > in > >>>>> at the same level. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll < > gsing...@apache.org > >>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all > >>> know > >>>>> what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a > >> good > >>>>> chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to > >> go > >>>>> with two things: > >>>>>> 1. Mahout as TLP > >>>>>> 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I > >>>>> think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by > >>> some > >>>>> successful GSOC projects. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -Grant > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to > wait > >>>>>>> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called) > >>> before > >>>>>>> we move forward with that, I thought. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -jake > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <robin.a...@gmail.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > >>>>>>>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to > >>>>>>>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, > >> any > >>>>>>>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for > >> this? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Robin > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> -------------------------- > >>> Grant Ingersoll > >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/ > >>> > >>> Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene: > >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search > >>> > >>> > >> > > -------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll > http://www.lucidimagination.com/ > > Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene: > http://www.lucidimagination.com/search > >
