FWIW I do agree that, in the end, the project should be a little more user-friendly. Right now you see it offers the raw machinery for running these processes, without much abstraction on top. I think the project can and will both unify how it exposes this machinery, and work to offer higher-level wrappers on top. That is to say I don't think you missed anything or asked a dumb question!
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Aleksander Stensby <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay, thanks Isabel! > That was what I thought, I just wanted to check if I had missed something > important here:)
