On 11/11/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That isn't part of the Mailet API at all, and doesn't belong there IMO. In JAMES, we have pluggable in-protocol handlers that are connected to such events. I do not know that anyone wants to standardize on our in-protocol plug-in architecture, which we're still evolving, but that seems separate from Mailets.
I agree that it is separate from mailets, but theres no reason why it couldn;t be another independant API which others could implement, It does solve the problem by providing an abstraction and it would be (as we already know) a different way to invoke some of the same underlying services, so there are some similarities. d.
