Discussion moved over from James Dev as per Stefano's suggestion.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [mailets] Proposal: MailetContext enhancement
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 20:25:53 +0100
From: Norman Maurer <[email protected]>
Reply-To: James Developers List <[email protected]>
To: James Developers List <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected] <[email protected]>
I dont agree with you here... I think just have an dispose method is fine. Its
not different the for example the need to close an EntityManager which is quite
nature in the enterprise.
bye
norman
Von meinem iPad gesendet
Am 18.12.2011 um 19:45 schrieb Steve Brewin<[email protected]>:
Obviously this was my first thought, but this exposes the mail server to
compromise by Mailets that forget to call dispose() on failure.
If we want to be Enterprise strength, this isn't good enough as it is too weak
a contract. We must guarantee that dispose will be called (my new solution), or
prevent the exposure (the current solution).
--Steve
On 18/12/2011 18:56, Norman Maurer wrote:
I would prefer more to just add a dispose() method to the Mail interface.
Bye,
Norman
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This private and confidential e-mail has been sent to you by Synergy Systems
Limited. It may not represent the views of Synergy Systems Limited.
If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail and have received it in error,
please notify the sender by replying with "received in error" as the subject
and then delete it from your mailbox.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
