On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 12:29, Darrell Fuhriman wrote: > To summarize, mailman should accept *all* RFC2822 valid e-mail > addresses. It's not up to us to decide what's good and what > isn't. If it's formatted correctly, then we should treat it as > correct. If the software can't cope, that's a bug in the > software, not in the e-mail address.
In principle I totally agree. It may not be feasible to completely audit MM2.1 for where fully supporting RFC 2822 will break things. It should absolutely be a goal for MM3. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
