On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Bob Puff wrote: > I think the majority of MM users will be simply using the RPM that comes with > their distro, and there is a real benefit to stuff working right "out of the > box". This includes the Archiving functions. > > Its great to have options, and giving a list of possible alternatives for > users is excellent, but I think releasing MM 3 without -any- archiver is a > down-grade from the current MM 2.x.
In the Debian world we would do something like this: Package: mailman3 Depends: mailman3-archiver-default | mailman3-archiver Package: mailman3-archiver-default Depends: mailman3-archiver-hyperkitty Package: mailman3-archiver-hyperkitty Provides: mailman3-archiver Is something like that not possible in the RPM world? I'm subscribed to the list, no need to CC me. -- bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
