On Feb 01, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Andrew Stuart wrote: >I’m going to store as string representation of the integer as I don’t want to >be dealing with databases or anything else that makes a distinction between >different types and lengths of integer.
That makes sense to me. Since Aurelien was okay with the status quo, I never did make the change described in that archive message. >Ideally the identifier would match the core internal identifier which is UUID >but since userid-as-UUID is not seen from the REST API side of things then >I’ll act like that concept does not exist and hope I’m not making things more >confused around user id. Yep, for now I think we'll keep the int-as-user-id concept, and it will be converted internally to a UUID. If/when we change that I'll have to keep backward compatibility with that API anyway. Cheers, -Barry _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
