On Wed, 2 May 2001 00:19:15 -0400 Jay R Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 12:10:30AM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: JRA> And therefore, not the best approach, by concensus, apparently. JRA> Barry? Have I misunderstood you? >> IMO, the archiver ought to be doing any date clobbering, but >> Pipermail is too painful to fix. Again, what do other external >> archivers do? I.e. if you passed an outrageously dated message >> to MHonArc, would it dutifully put the message in the April 2006 >> slot? > Ok; that's what I thought I'd heard. That is what it does (and what I want). -- J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------(*) http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ --=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=-- _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Owen Taylor
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Barry A. Warsaw
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Jay R. Ashworth
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Barry A. Warsaw
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Jay R. Ashworth
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Jay R. Ashworth
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Barry A. Warsaw
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Jay R. Ashworth
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Jay R. Ashworth
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Barry A. Warsaw
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates J C Lawrence
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Barry A. Warsaw
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Jay R. Ashworth
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates J C Lawrence
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Jay R. Ashworth
- [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates David Champion
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Jay R. Ashworth
- [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates Barry A. Warsaw
- Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Dates J C Lawrence
