On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 02:54:35PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> I see there was a redundant definition of the .po->.mo file
> transformation. I'll bet BSDmake was picking up the broken .po.mo
> entry and GNUmake was picking up the full rule down below.
That's exactly what happened. I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw BSD make
and GNU make attach the exact opposite meaning to $@ and $<, but I didn't
think to search for redundant definitions ! I think $< is still a
GNU-makeism, but I can live with requiring GNU make for building catalogs
just fine.
--
Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
