On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:40:31AM +0800, Mark Tearle wrote: > Mine attacks the problem by enabling lists to be set up which > can pull there membership in from other lists. > (ie at the who is on the list stage of the pipeline) I looked at your patch closer and you're right. Sorry for the misunderstanding. > Ben's attacks the problem by ensuring that an individual only > gets delivered one copy of an email (based on the message ID) > (ie at the delivery stage)
This is indeed what I need. (it apparently also notices that you are Cced in a mail and doesn't send the post copy to you) > What problem are you trying to tackle? People who are trying to set reply-to munging because they don't want receipients to receive two copies of the posts. While the solution is bad, the initial need is real. (well, there is also that part about "reply to all" being apparently much harder to use than "reply", but I tend to dismiss that) > PS. Marc, coming to LCA 2002? http://www.linux.org.au/conf/ I submitted 5 or 6 papers. Hopefully they'll pick one up :-) Marc -- Microsoft is to operating systems & security .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP key _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
