At 2:18 -0500 12/1/01, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: >I'm more concerned with the user who fills up his disk and doesn't >notice it for a week because they're on vacation. I'd like Mailman to >be robust against this, and I think the average non-deliveries over a >couple of weeks, with consignment to probation probably catches most >of this use case.
I'd prefer that such folks subscribe again if still interested. You've provided that option, so that's not a complaint about the design. Note that the "one last warning" may well bounce in this case. On the other hand, I was on one list with a one bounce and you're out rule (clearly stated in the welcome message). That's too draconian for even me to use (I had to resubscribe about 4 times over 3 years). They were using Majordomo, and the person in charge had a quick trigger finger. ;-) --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
