MM> I'm not 100% sure it was meant to work that way, it looked
MM> like the code meant to send all the deliveries in one
MM> connection, which is why it didn't say helo in the second
MM> batch. So, I've removed the part that closes the connection
MM> after the first chunk is out.
| Barry, was this right?
| (I didn't check if it breaks the threaded code path)
MM> PS: Don't make fun of me for sticking a '1' in there, I don't
MM> really claim to know python, and the parser was getting upset
MM> if I commented out conn.quit, or that plus the finally: I was
MM> watching Buffy on my tivo before all this happened, and I'd
MM> like to see the end of the episode :-) (see, just Like Niguel,
MM> I have a worthy excuse :-D)
Actually using pass instead of 1 would be the Pythonically correct
thing to do (pass is essentially a noop).
I /think/ changing conn.quit() to conn.close() is the right change,
but I'm not 100% sure and I don't have time to test it right now. Can
you give it a try and see if that works for you?
-Barry
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
