[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barry A. Warsaw) writes: > True. I wonder if Reply-To: ought to be added to the mix?
It wouldn't hurt. FWIW, TMDA checks Reply-To: in addition to From: and the envelope sender. > Note that all are easily spoofable, so that argument doesn't bother > me much. Exactly. Which is why I don't understand why all MLMs don't do this. It just makes things more difficult for list subscribers. Majordomo checks just From: and Reply-To:, ezmlm checks just the envelope sender, etc. Well, at least we are "fixing" this here. > If so, the order ought to go (I think) > > 1. From: > 2. From_ > 3. Reply-To: > 4. Sender: Alrighty. -- (TMDA (http://tmda.sourceforge.net/) (UCE intrusion prevention in Python) _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
